Sports Cardiology
Echocardiographic Cut-Off Parameters for Athlete´s Heart

Echocardiographic Criteria for Athlete´s Heart with Cut-off Parameters and Special Emphasis on the Right Ventricle

Echokardiographische Kriterien zur Beurteilung des Sportherzens mit besonderem Focus auf den rechten Ventrikel


Athlete´s heart was first described atthe beginning of the 20th century and since then has been an area of active debate. In the last decades its conditions and implications have been revealed thanksto modern imaging technology. Therefore the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) published a joint position statement for the use and interpretation of cardiovascular imaging in the evaluation of athlete´s heart. Cardiac adaptation or remodeling due to intensive exercise training can be influenced by physiological or pathological factors. Athlete´s heart is per definition described asa harmonic and consistent increase in dimension of all four cardiac chambers, wherebyfemale athletes display only moderate cardiac changes compared to their male counterparts.

This paper will present recent scientific data with current echocardiographic cut-off parameters for athlete´s heart and secondly will deal with the right ventricle, more specifically, with the echocardiographic differentiation between athlete´s heart and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). ARVC is an inherited heart muscle disease characterized by progressive fibrofatty replacement of the right ventricular -and in up to 50% of the cases also of the left ventricular -myocardium. This pathological remodeling is aggravated by sports and might be the substrate for ventricular arrhythmias as well as sudden cardiac death. Clinical experience with the 2010 International Task Force diagnostic score system has identified some limitations potentially resulting in overdiagnosis - especially in athletes - due to e. g. misinterpretation of electrocardiographic and imaging findings. Hence this paper will provide an overview ofthe latest literature with echocardiographic parameters for a better distinction between ARVC and sports-related remodeling of the right ventricle in athletes.

KEY WORDS: Sports-Related Cardiac Remodeling, Cardiac Imaging, Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathie


Das Sportherz wurde erstmalig zu Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts beschrieben und seither kontrovers diskutiert. Jedoch konnte durch die Weiterentwicklung vor allem der bildgebenden kardialen Verfahren in den letzten Jahrzenten aufgezeigt werden, dass es sich hierbei um einen physiologischen kardialen Anpassungsvorgang handelt. 2017 veröffentlichten die European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) und die European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) eine gemeinsame Stellungnahme über den Gebrauch und die Interpretation der kardialen bildgebenden Verfahren in Bezug auf das Sportherz. Das kardiale Remodeling aufgrund von führend umfangreichem Ausdauertraining kann sowohl durch physiologische als auch durch pathologische Faktoren beeinflusst werden. Prinzipiell ist das Sportherz ein harmonisch vergrößertes Herz und Athletinnen weisen insgesamt geringere Anpassungen auf als Athleten.

In dieser Arbeitwerden daher zum einen die aktuellen echokardiographischen Parameter für die Definition eines Sportherzens aufgeführt und zum anderen ein weiterer Schwerpunkt auf den rechten Ventrikel gesetzt, insbesondere auf die echokardiographische Differenzierung zwischen Sportherz und arrhythmogener rechtsventrikulärer Kardiomyopathie (ARVC). Die ARVC ist eine vererbbare Kardiomyopathie, die einen progressiven Ersatz des rechts- aber auch des linksventrikulären Myokards durch Binde-/Fettgewebe aufweist. Dieses pathologische myokardiale Remodeling wird durch Sport aggraviert/beschleunigt und kann zu ventrikulären Arrhythmien bis hin zum plötzlichen Herztod führen. Das seit 2010 etablierte Task Force Diagnostic Scoring System weist - vor allem bei Sportlern - gewisse Limitationen auf (u. a. elektrokardiopgrahisch als auch in der Bildgebung), die zu einer Häufung von falsch positiven ARVC-Diagnosen führen kann. Daher wird diese Arbeit auch einen Überblick über die aktuelle Literatur mit echokardiographischen Parametern zur besseren Differenzierung zwischen ARVC und Sport-bedingter rechtsventrikulärer Adaptation verschaffen.

SCHLÜSSELWÖRTER: Sportbedingtes kardiales Remodeling, kardiale Bildgebung, arrhythmogene Kardiomyopathie


Intensive physical exercise can lead to miscellaneous morphological and functional cardiac adaptations that are summarized under the term "athlete´s heart". The first description of athlete´s heart was observed 1899 in cross-country skiers by Henschen. Henschen concluded that the enlarged heart was a physiological adaptation due to years of quantitative and qualitative demanding aerobic endurance training. In Germany, Reindell was one of the forefathers who established this term and conducted research in this field since the end of the 1930s. Moreover, Urhausen and Kindermann described sports-specific adaptations and emphasized that the term "athlete´s heart" might be misleading since not every athlete - even if competing for years at a very high level - develops an enlarged heart (41).

Since then this condition was and still is an area of active debate. Modern technology - especially in cardiovascular imaging - reveals new insights and thus clinicians as well as scientists try to illuminate the concept of cardiac remodeling in athletes.

In this context, the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) published a joint position statement for the use and interpretation of cardiovascular imaging in the evaluation of athlete´s heart (27). Cardiac adaptation or remodeling due to intensive exercise training can be influenced by physiological (e.g. sporting discipline, sex, ethnicity, body size and age) or pathological factors (e. g. drug-induced, cardiomyopathy), that have to be distinguished and taken into account when determining the athlete´s heart. The heart of an athlete is always characterized by a harmonic and consistent increase in dimension of all cardiac chambers (27, 35). Overall, female athletes display similar cardiac changes to their male counterparts but commonly to a lesser extent in term of absolute values (27).

Subsequent the recent echocardiographic cut-off parameters are presented according to current international scientific data, and furthermore, a special emphasis will be put on the right ventricle (RV) for echocardiographic differentiation between athlete´s heart vs. arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.

Left Ventricular (LV) Wall Thickness

Most Caucasian athletes have a maximal LV wall thickness up to 12 mm, with a grey zone between 13-16 mm in 2% of the athletes; in females the upper limit of normal is <11 mm with a grey zone between 11-13 mm (31, 39). These borderline values might be suspicious for a moderate form of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and should warrant further evaluation or at least regular follow-up if the athlete is asymptomatic and displays no other abnormality (e. g. T-wave-changes in 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)). In contrast to this, black athletes have a higher prevalence of ECG-changes and more often present with LV hypertrophy (19). The first data from Asian and Arab athletes show a similar or even lower prevalence of LV wall thickness than in white athletes (18, 32). In adolescent athletes, the LV wall thickness should not exceed 11 mm (36).

In clinical practice, the relative wall thickness (RWT) can be used to characterize morphological remodeling of the LV. The RWT is calculated as twice the LV posterior wall thickness devided by LV diameter. Generally, the RWT does not exceed 42% in athletes (41). Even values between 0.30 and 0.45 seem compatible with phyosiologic LV remodeling (14).

LV Diameter

In a reference study with 1309 elite athletes, 45% had an increased LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and even 14% of these athletes had an LVEDD >60 mm (28). The upper cut-off values for LVEDD in male athletes is reported as up to 70 mm (28), in female athletes up to 66 mm (28, 29), whereas in adolescent athletes the LVEDD should not exceed 60 mm (36). Since the cardiac cavities are strongly related to body size, the LV diameter should always be indexed to body surface area (BSA). Most widely used for the calculation of BSA is the Dubois regression. The upper limit in male athletes is defined as <35 mm/m², whereas in female athletes <40 mm/m² (27, 28).

LV Function

The LV ejection fraction (LVEF) is not influenced by intensive physical training and therefore should be consistently >50%(6, 27). If an athlete presents with LVEF <50% at rest, further evaluation is necessary (e. g. by exercise stress echocardiography) and should be monitored in follow-up visits. The method of choice for LVEF quantification is the Simpson`s method (20).

Three-dimensional (3D-) and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) have emerged as relatively novel echocardiographic techniques and can be useful for better differentiation of athlete´s heart vs. dilated or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with pre-/subclinical anomalies. Among these techniques, the 2-dimensional (2D) LV global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) is currently the most-used parameter in clinical practice as well as in trials. In order to standardize the use of 2D-STE to ameliorate the daily application for all cardiac cavities two consensus documents have already been published by EACVI, ASE (American Society of Echocardiography) and the Industry Task Force (1, 43). Current LV-GLS standard values in the general (healthy) population vary between -16 and -22%, with a mean value of -20% (depending on the available studies (4, 7)) - with comparable values in athletes (4, 7, 16, 24, 37, 38, 44). The LV-GLS is not influenced by exercise training. Hence, an LV-GLS value <-15% in athletes is suspicious for an underlying myocardial disease, especially if other concomitant subclinical anomalies are present (4, 7, 16, 24, 37, 38, 44).

No changes appeared considering quantification of diastolic function and normal/physiological values in athletes (E/A ratio >2, s` peak velocity at rest >8 cm/s, e` peak velocity of the mitral annulus >10 cm/s) (5, 6, 9, 42). The smaller E and e` waves and higher A and a´ waves in master athletes reflect the physiological aging process of the LV (13, 15).

Left and Right Atrium

Both atria undergo structural and functional remodeling by exercise training.

Left atrial volume (LAV) is the preferred method for assessing LA remodeling (20, 27), ideally indexed to BSA (LAVi ≥34 mL/m² denotes a mild enlargement) (10, 20). In 1777 examined athletes, 18% presented with an anteroposterior (AP) diameter ≥40 mm (i. e. mild increase) and only 2% with a marked dilation (≥45 mm) (30). The reported upper cut-off values for AP diameter were 50 mm in male and 45 mm in female athletes, respectively (30). The often used linear measurement of AP diameter is no longer recommended as a sole measure for left atrial size since it is not representative for dilated atria due to its single dimension (20).

Right atrial area indexed to BSA should be the measurement of choice. There are two different cut-off values for the upper limit of normal in athletes, depending on the chosen study. Zaidi et al. examined 675 athletes with a cut-off of 28 cm²/m² in male and 24 cm²/m² in female athletes, whereas D`Ascenzi et al. examined 1009 athletes and found a cut-off of 25 cm²/m² and 20 cm²/m², respectively (12, 45).

The Right Ventricle (RV)

For years, the RV has been the "forbidden chamber". The anatomy of the RV is very complex and thus most of echocardiographic laboratories still perform only qualitative assessment. Especially with endurance training a physiological RV enlargement is observed. The RV enlargement has to be proportional to LV enlargement in order to meet sports-related cardiac remodeling. Therefore, it is very import to accurately measure both RV diameters and function following the current international guidelines (20) and to state these parameters in the report.

For RV diameter measurement the RV focused apical 4-chamber view should be used (see Figure 1A) and for the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) the parasternal long (PLAx) or short axis view (PSAx) (Figure 1B and C). The most feasible measurements for the RV function in daily clinical practice/routine (since less time-consuming) are presented in Figure 2 and 3. These measurements are all performed with 2D-echocardiography. In Figure 1A-C the upper or lower limit of normal values for normal healthy adult individuals are presented in accordance with international guidelines (20), whereas in athletes larger deviations from these values are detectable and represent physiological RV remodeling (see Table 1). These values can differ according to sporting discipline (11) and gender (12).

Athlete´s Heart vs. ARVC

Since athlete´s hearts are by definition larger than "untrained hearts", there is a potential risk of false suspicion of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) in athletes (8, 17, 22). For the diagnosis of ARVC the Task Force criteria should be used which date back to 2010 and comprise various categories such as electrical parameters, imaging, tissue properties, family history and genetic testing (22). However, typical findings like isolated RV enlargement, RV bulging, thinning and aneurysms will normally not be found in healthy athletes. Corrado et al. recently evaluated the current diagnostic criteria and differential diagnosis for ARVC (8). This International Expert Report maintains the original designation of ARVC, although biventricular and left-dominant disease variants are now known (8). Therefore the term "arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy" (AC) can also be found in literature and comprises the broader spectrum of the disease phenotypic expressions (8, 40). The EACVI published 2017 an expert consensus document for a comprehensive multi-modality imaging approach in AC (17). This expert consensus group recommended replacing the former term ARVC with AC due to the frequent involvement of both the RV and LV (LV is affected in >50% of cases) (17). AC is a progressive, transmural myocardial disease. The first morphological changes are found in the epi- or mid-myocardium and finally extend to all myocardial layers. Therefore, ECG-changes are often the first manifestation. Vice versa, an AC diagnosis based only on imaging criteria with completely normal ECG is questionable (17). Neither Haugaa et al. (17) nor Corrado et al. (8) mention the hypothesis of and the term "exercise-induced" ARVC that appeared in recent years. Bohm et al. had already challenged the notion that cumulative effects of long-term intensive endurance exercise in elite master athletes might induce chronic cardiac damage (3).

In order to avoid confusion the original designation of ARVC will be maintained in this document.

RV size is one of the commonly used and essential diagnostic parameters for the "classic" ARVC phenotype (22), but it is not representative for athletes and is therefore the most important limitation. D`Ascenzi et al. reported RV remodeling in 1009 Olympic athletes and compared the collected data to the then-used criteria proposed by the ASE and Canadian Society of Echocardiography (33) as well as to the modified Task Force criteria (22) for the diagnosis of ARVC (12). It is not surprising that RV remodeling occurs in Olympic athletes - especially in male and endurance athletes. In conclusion, the authors suggested using the major diagnostic Task Force criteria in Olympic athletes to better differentiate between ARVC and RV remodeling (12).

Zaidi et al. already proposed a kind of algorithm with different parameters (including ECG and cardiac magnetic resonance tomography (CMR)) to improve clinical differentiation between physiological cardiac remodeling in athletes and ARVC (46). Two important 2D-echocardiographic parameters highlighted were RV FAC (see Figure 3, with ≤30% ARVC should be considered, see Table 2) and a ratio of RV diameter 1 (RVD1, see Figure 1A) and LVEDD measured at the PLAx (with RVD1/LVEDD ratio ≤0.9 athlete´s RV should be considered, see Table 2) (46).


A systematic review and meta-analysis for normative reference values in competitive athletes suggests a similar approach in order to prevent unwarranted false-positive diagnosis (11). The authors state that even healthy athletes can show a slightly lower RV function at rest than healthy individuals (11). The remodeling already reported by Zaidi et al. with the ratio of RVD1 and LVEDD (46) was also tested and no significant difference between sporting discipline was seen and all the athletes showed harmonic biventricular remodeling (12). Therefore, D`Ascenzi et al. recommend use of this ratio as an additional parameter to interpret RV enlargement in borderline cases (12) (see Table 2). Moreover, a predominant increase of the RVOT can be observed in ARVC patients, whereas in athletes there should be a consistent increase in RV inflow (measured as RVD1 by echocardiography, see Figure 1A) and outflow segments due to exercise-related, physiological RV remodeling (2). Altogether, it is proposed to use only major dimensional criteria indexed to BSA to define RV enlargement in athletes(11, 12, 27, 46) (see Table 2).

3D-Echogardiography and STE are not yet routine diagnostic techniques in quantification of the RV. Nevertheless, it complements the basic 2D-echocardiographic measurements and can help to better differentiate between athlete´s heart and ARVC. As in LV-GLS, the RV-GLS and strain rate (see Figure 4) in athletes are comparable to non-athletes (25, 26). Using RV-GLS it is important to distinguish between the RV free wall strain (3-segment model) vs. strain from 6 segments (averaged from both the RV septal and RV free wall segments), since the free wall strain achieves higher absolute values (RV strain from 3 segment with lower limit of normal >-23% vs. RV strain from 6 segment model with lower limit of normal >-20%, see Table 2) (23). For further distinction the mechanical dispersion (MD) of RV contraction detected by STE can be used (for cut-off values see Table 2). The first studies suggest that MD may even represent an early predictor of future arrhythmic events (21, 34). These imaging techniques are not yet used in everyday clinical routine but rather in studies and are reserved to echocardiographers experienced in using STE and 3D-imaging.


Athlete´s heart is by definition described as a harmonic and consistent enlargement of all cardiac chambers. This physiological cardiac remodeling due to intensive exercise training can be influenced by sporting discipline, gender, ethnicity, body size and age. Therefore, all these parameters must be taken into account to ensure proper diagnosis and to distinguish physiological cardiac adaptations from pathological conditions that might be potentially life-threatening for the athlete.

Hence, this document offers an overview of the current echocardiographic cut-off values (with upper or lower limits) that can be present in highly trained athletes. Moreover, Table 2 provides a comprehensive overview of current echocardiographic parameters for a better distinction of athlete´s heart from ARVC. Since athletic activities aggravate structural disease in ARVC patients and accelerate the risk for (symptomatic) ventricular arrhythmias clinical cardiologists as well as sport medicine specialists should be familiar with the physiological/sports-related RV remodeling in athletes. The RV dilation in athletes involves the RV inflow and outflow tract and an isolated RV enlargement as well as RV bulging, thinning or aneurysm will normally not appear in healthy athletes. By contrast, a reduced TAPSE and/or RV strain rate is suggestive for ARVC. Nevertheless, it is recommended to always request CMR imaging in athletes with suspected ARVC (17).

Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.


  1. BADANO LP, KOLIAS TJ, MURARU D, ABRAHAM TP, AURIGEMMA G,EDVARDSEN T, D'HOOGE J, DONAL E, FRASER AG, MARWICK T, MERTENS L,POPESCU BA, SENGUPTA PP, LANCELLOTTI P, THOMAS JD, VOIGT JU;INDUSTRY REPRESENTATIVES; REVIEWERS: THIS DOCUMENT WASREVIEWED BY MEMBERS OF THE 2016-2018 EACVI SCIENTIFICDOCUMENTS COMMITTEE. Standardization of left atrial, rightventricular, and right atrial deformation imaging using twodimensionalspeckle tracking echocardiography: a consensusdocument of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardizedeformation imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018; 19:591-600.
  2. BAUCE B, FRIGO G, BENINI G, MICHIELI P, BASSO C, FOLINO AF, RIGATO I,MAZZOTTI E, DALIENTO L, THIENE G, NAVA A. Differences andsimilarities between arrhythmogenic right ventricularcardiomyopathy and athlete’s heart adaptations. Br J SportsMed. 2010; 44: 148-154.
  3. BOHM P, SCHNEIDER G, LINNEWEBER L, RENTZSCH A, KRAMER N, ABDULKHALIQH, KINDERMANN W, MEYER T, SCHARHAG J. Right and LeftVentricular Function and Mass in Male Elite Master Athletes:A Controlled Contrast-Enhanced Cardiovascular MagneticResonance Study. Circulation. 2016; 133: 1927-1935.
  4. CAPPELLI F, TONCELLI L, CAPPELLI B, DE LUCA A, STEFANI L, MAFFULLI N,GALANTI G. Adaptative or maladaptative hypertrophy,different spatial distribution of myocardial contraction. ClinPhysiol Funct Imaging. 2010; 30: 6-12.
  5. CARDIM N, OLIVEIRA AG, LONGO S, FERREIRA T, PEREIRA A, REIS RP,CORREIA JM. Doppler tissue imaging: regional myocardialfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and in athlete’sheart. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003; 16: 223-232.
  6. CASELLI S, DI PAOLO FM, PISICCHIO C, PANDIAN NG, PELLICCIA A. Patterns of left ventricular diastolic function in Olympicathletes. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015; 28: 236-244.
  7. CASELLI S, MONTESANTI D, AUTORE C, DI PAOLO FM, PISICCHIO C,SQUEO MR, MUSUMECI B, SPATARO A, PANDIAN NG, PELLICCIA A. Patterns of left ventricular longitudinal strain and strain ratein Olympic athletes. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015; 28: 245-253.
  9. D'ANDREA A, LIMONGELLI G, CASO P, SARUBBI B, DELLA PIETRA A,BRANCACCIO P, CICE G, SCHERILLO M, LIMONGELLI F, CALABRO R. Association between left ventricular structure and cardiacperformance during effort in two morphological forms ofathlete’s heart. Int J Cardiol. 2002; 86: 177-184.
  10. D'ANDREA A, RIEGLER L, COCCHIA R, SCARAFILE R, SALERNO G,GRAVINO R, GOLIA E, VRIZ O, CITRO R, LIMONGELLI G, CALABRO P,DI SALVO G, CASO P, RUSSO MG, BOSSONE E, CALABRO R. Left atrialvolume index in highly trained athletes. Am Heart J. 2010; 159:1155-1161.
  11. D'ASCENZI F, PELLICCIA A, SOLARI M, PIU P, LOIACONO F, ANSELMI F,CASELLI S, FOCARDI M, BONIFAZI M, MONDILLO S. Normative ReferenceValues of Right Heart in Competitive Athletes: A SystematicReview and Meta-Analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017; 30: 845-858.e2.
  12. D’ASCENZI F, PISICCHIO C, CASELLI S, DI PAOLO FM, SPATARO A,PELLICCIA A. RV Remodeling in Olympic Athletes. JACCCardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 10: 385-393.
  13. DONAL E, ROZOY T, KERVIO G, SCHNELL F, MABO P, CARRÉ F. Comparisonof the heart function adaptation in trained and sedentary menafter 50 and before 35 years of age. Am J Cardiol. 2011; 108: 1029-1037.
  14. DOUGLAS PS, O’TOOLE ML, KATZ SE, GINSBURG GS, HILLER WD, LAIRD RH. Left ventricular hypertrophy in athletes. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 80:1384-1388.
  15. FLEG JL, SHAPIRO EP, O’CONNOR F, TAUBE J, GOLDBERG AP, LAKATTA EG. Left ventricular diastolic filling performance in oldermale athletes. JAMA. 1995; 273: 1371-1375.
  16. GALDERISI M, LOMORIELLO VS, SANTORO A, ESPOSITO R, OLIBET M,RAIA R, DI MINNO MN, GUERRA G, MELE D, LOMBARDI G. Differencesof myocardial systolic deformation and correlates of diastolicfunction in competitive rowers and young hypertensives:a speckle-tracking echocardiography study. J Am SocEchocardiogr. 2010; 23: 1190-1198.
  18. KERVIO G, PELLICCIA A, NAGASHIMA J, WILSON MG, GAUTHIER J,MURAYAMA M, UZAN L, VILLE N, CARRE F. Alterations inechocardiographic and electrocardiographic features inJapanese professional soccer players: comparison to African-Caucasian ethnicities. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013; 20: 880-888.
  19. KINDERMANN W, SCHARHAG J. The African / Afro-CaribbeanAthlete’s Heart. Dtsch Z Sportmed. 2016; 67: 18-22.
  20. LANG RM, BADANO LP, MOR-AVI V, AFILALO J, ARMSTRONG A, ERNANDE L,FLACHSKAMPF FA, FOSTER E, GOLDSTEIN SA, KUZNETSOVA T,LANCELLOTTI P, MURARU D, PICARD MH, RIETZSCHEL ER, RUDSKI L,SPENCER KT, TSANG W, VOIGT JU. Recommendations for cardiacchamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: anupdate from the American Society of Echocardiography andthe European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am SocEchocardiogr. 2015; 28: 1-39.e14.
  21. LEREN IS, SABERNIAK J, HALAND TF, EDVARDSEN T, HAUGAA KH. Combination of ECG and Echocardiography for Identificationof Arrhythmic Events in Early ARVC. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging.2017; 10: 503-513.
  22. MARCUS FI, MCKENNA WJ, SHERRILL D, BASSO C, BAUCE B, BLUEMKE DA,CALKINS H, CORRADO D, COX MG, DAUBERT JP, FONTAINE G, GEAR K,HAUER R, NAVA A, PICARD MH, PROTONOTARIOS N, SAFFITZ JE, SANBORN DM,STEINBERG JS, TANDRI H, THIENE G, TOWBIN JA, TSATSOPOULOU A,WICHTER T, ZAREBA W. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic rightventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: proposed modificationof the task force criteria. Circulation. 2010; 121: 1533-1541.
  23. MURARU D, ONCIUL S, PELUSO D, SORIANI N, CUCCHINI U, ARUTA P,ROMEO G, CAVALLI G, ILICETO S, BADANO LP. Sex- and Method-SpecificReference Values for Right Ventricular Strain by 2-DimensionalSpeckle-Tracking Echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging.2016; 9: e003866.
  24. NOTTIN S, DOUCENDE G, SCHUSTER-BECK I, DAUZAT M, OBERT P. Alteration in left ventricular normal and shear strains evaluatedby 2D-strain echocardiography in the athlete’s heart. J Physiol.2008; 586: 4721-4733.
  25. OXBOROUGH D, SHARMA S, SHAVE R, WHYTE G, BIRCH K, ARTIS N,BATTERHAM AM, GEORGE K. The right ventricle of the enduranceathlete: the relationship between morphology and deformation.J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012; 25: 263-271.
  26. OXBOROUGH D, SHAVE R, WARBURTON D, WILLIAMS K, OXBOROUGH A,CHARLESWORTH S, FOULDS H, HOFFMAN MD, BIRCH K, GEORGE K. Dilatation and dysfunction of the right ventricle immediatelyafter ultraendurance exercise: exploratory insights fromconventional two-dimensional and speckle trackingechocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011; 4: 253-263.
  27. PELLICCIA A1, CASELLI S, SHARMA S, BASSO C, BAX JJ, CORRADO D,D'ANDREA A, D'ASCENZI F, DI PAOLO FM, EDVARDSEN T, GATI S, GALDERISI M,HEIDBUCHEL H, NCHIMI A, NIEMAN K, PAPADAKIS M, PISICCHIO C,SCHMIED C, POPESCU BA, HABIB G, GROBBEE D, LANCELLOTTI P;INTERNAL REVIEWERS FOR EAPC AND EACVI. European Associationof Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) and European Associationof Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) joint position statement:recommendations for the indication and interpretation ofcardiovascular imaging in the evaluation of the athlete's heart.Eur Heart J. 2018; 39: 1949-1969.
  28. PELLICCIA A, CULASSO F, DI PAOLO FM, MARON BJ. Physiologic leftventricular cavity dilatation in elite athletes. Ann Intern Med.1999; 130: 23-31.
  29. PELLICCIA A, MARON BJ, CULASSO F, SPATARO A, CASELLI G. Athlete’sheart in women. Echocardiographic characterization ofhighly trained elite female athletes. JAMA. 1996; 276: 211-215.
  30. PELLICCIA A, MARON BJ, DI PAOLO FM, BIFFI A, QUATTRINI FM, PISICCHIO C,ROSELLI A, CASELLI S, CULASSO F. Prevalence and clinicalsignificance of left atrial remodeling in competitive athletes. JAm Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46: 690-696.
  31. PELLICCIA A, MARON BJ, SPATARO A, PROSCHAN MA, SPIRITO P. Theupper limit of physiologic cardiac hypertrophy in highly trainedelite athletes. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324: 295-301.
  32. RIDING NR, SALAH O, SHARMA S, CARRE F, GEORGE KP, FAROOQ A,HAMILTON B, CHALABI H, WHYTE GP, WILSON MG. ECG andmorphologic adaptations in Arabic athletes: are the EuropeanSociety of Cardiology’s recommendations for the interpretationof the 12-lead ECG appropriate for this ethnicity? Br J SportsMed. 2014; 48: 1138-1143.
  33. RUDSKI LG, LAI WW , AFILALO J, HUA L, HANDSCHUMACHER MD,CHANDRASEKARAN K, SOLOMON SD, LOUIE EK, SCHILLER NB. Guidelinesfor the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart inadults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiographyendorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, aregistered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and theCanadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr.2010; 23: 685-713, quiz 786-788.
  34. SARVARI SI, HAUGAA KH, ANFINSEN OG, LEREN TP, SMISETH OA,KONGSGAARD E, AMLIE JP, EDVARDSEN T. Right ventricularmechanical dispersion is related to malignant arrhythmias:a study of patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricularcardiomyopathy and subclinical right ventricular dysfunction.Eur Heart J. 2011; 32: 1089-1096.
  35. SCHARHAG J, SCHNEIDER G, URHAUSEN A, ROCHETTE V, KRAMANN B,KINDERMANN W. Athlete’s heart: right and left ventricular massand function in male endurance athletes and untrainedindividuals determined by magnetic resonance imaging.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 40: 1856-1863.
  36. SHARMA S, MARON BJ, WHYTE G, FIROOZI S, ELLIOTT PM, MCKENNA WJ. Physiologic limits of left ventricular hypertrophy in elite juniorathletes: relevance to differential diagnosis of athlete’s heart andhypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 40: 1431-1436.
  37. SIMSEK Z, HAKAN TAS M, DEGIRMENCI H, GOKHAN YAZICI A, IPEK E,DUMAN H, GUNDOGDU F, KARAKELLEOGLU S, SENOCAK H. Speckletracking echocardiographic analysis of left ventricular systolicand diastolic functions of young elite athletes with eccentric andconcentric type of cardiac remodeling. Echocardiography. 2013;30: 1202-1208.
  38. SOULLIER C, OBERT P, DOUCENDE G, NOTTIN S, CADE S, PEREZMARTINA, MESSNER-PELLENC P, SCHUSTER I. Exercise responsein hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: blunted left ventriculardeformational and twisting reserve with altered systolicdiastoliccoupling. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 5: 324-332.
  39. SPIRITO P, PELLICCIA A, PROSCHAN MA, GRANATA M, SPATARO A,BELLONE P, CASELLI G, BIFFI A, VECCHIO C, MARON BJ. Morphology ofthe “athlete’s heart” assessed by echocardiography in 947 eliteathletes representing 27 sports. Am J Cardiol. 1994; 74: 802-806.
  40. TOWBIN JA, MCKENNA WJ, ABRAMS DJ, ACKERMAN MJ, CALKINS H,DARRIEUX FCC, DAUBERT JP, DE CHILLOU C, DEPASQUALE EC, DESAI MY,ESTES NAM, 3RD, HUA W, INDIK JH, INGLES J, JAMES CA, JOHN RM,JUDGE DP, KEEGAN R, KRAHN AD, LINK MS, MARCUS FI, MCLEOD CJ,MESTRONI L, PRIORI SG, SAFFITZ JE, SANATANI S, SHIMIZU W, VANTINTELEN JP, WILDE AAM, ZAREBA W. 2019 HRS expert consensusstatement on evaluation, risk stratification, and managementof arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: Executive summary. HeartRhythm. 2019; 16: e373-e407.
  41. URHAUSEN A, KINDERMANN W. Sports-specific adaptations anddifferentiation of the athlete’s heart. Sports Med. 1999; 28: 237-244.
  42. VINEREANU D, FLORESCU N, SCULTHORPE N, TWEDDEL AC, STEPHENS MR,FRASER AG. Differentiation between pathologic and physiologicleft ventricular hypertrophy by tissue Doppler assessmentof long-axis function in patients with hypertrophiccardiomyopathy or systemic hypertension and in athletes. Am JCardiol. 2001; 88: 53-58.
  43. VOIGT JU, PEDRIZZETTI G, LYSYANSKY P, MARWICK TH, HOULE H,BAUMANN R, PEDRI S, ITO Y, ABE Y, METZ S, SONG JH, HAMILTON J,SENGUPTA PP, KOLIAS TJ, D'HOOGE J, AURIGEMMA GP, THOMAS JD,BADANO LP. Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckletracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 16: 1-11.
  44. WEINER RB, HUTTER AM Jr, WANG F, KIM J, WEYMAN AE, WOOD MJ,PICARD MH, BAGGISH AL. The impact of endurance exercise trainingon left ventricular torsion. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010; 3:1001-1009.
  45. ZAIDI A, GHANI S, SHARMA R, OXBOROUGH D, PANOULAS VF, SHEIKH N,GATI S, PAPADAKIS M, SHARMA S. Physiological right ventricularadaptation in elite athletes of African and Afro-Caribbeanorigin. Circulation. 2013; 127: 1783-1792.
  46. ZAIDI A, SHEIKH N, JONGMAN JK, GATI S, PANOULAS VF, CARRWHITEG, PAPADAKIS M, SHARMA R, BEHR ER, SHARMA S. ClinicalDifferentiation Between Physiological Remodeling andArrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy inAthletes With Marked Electrocardiographic RepolarizationAnomalies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 65: 2702-2711.
Dr. med. Hasema Persch
Division of Sports and
Rehabilitation Medicine
University Hospital Ulm
Leimgrubenweg 14, 89075 Ulm, Germany