High Performance Sports
REVIEW
Epidemiology of Unintentional and Intentional Injury in Para Athletes

Epidemiology of Unintentional and Intentional Injury in Para Athletes: A Narrative Review

Epidemiologie unbeabsichtigter und vorsätzlicher Verletzungen bei Para-Athleten: Eine narrative Übersicht

Summary

Problem: Sports provide health-related benefits but also confer risk of both accidental (unintentional) and non-accidental (intentional) injuries. Compared to non-disabled athletes, athletes with impairment (Para athletes) are particularly vulnerable to both unintentional and intentional injuries. Despite increasing global Para sport participation, there is a dearth of injury epidemiology scholarship in this group. This literature gap complicates efforts to assess risk factors and develop injury prevention strategies.

Methods: Published injury epidemiology literature in Para athletes was reviewed. Unintentional injuries were defined as unplanned and resulting from accidents or overuse; intentional injuries were defined as harmful maltreatment (eg, bullying, harassment, abuse, and all other forms of intentional violence).

Results: Literature on unintentional injury epidemiology in Para athletes is limited, but suggest injury incidence is higher in winter compared to summer Para sports (at the elite level). Ambulant Para athletes are more susceptible to lower extremity injury when compared to seated Para athletes, but overall, the upper extremity is the most commonly injured anatomic region in this group. Literature on intentional injury is similarly scant, but data indicate Para athletes may be up to four times more likely to experience intentional violence in sport compared to non-disabled peers.

Discussion: Para athletes are significantly more likely to suffer intentional violence when compared to non-disabled athletes. Conclusions are limited by the paucity of studies. Broader population-level research is needed to better understand risk factors and injury prevention strategies.

KEY WORDS: Sports Injury Epidemiology, Para Athletes, Intentional Violence, Injury Prevention

Zusammenfassung

Problem: Sport bietet gesundheitliche Vorteile, birgt aber auch das Risiko von zufälligen (unbeabsichtigten) und nicht zufälligen (absichtlichen) Verletzungen. Im Vergleich zu nicht-behinderten Altersgenossen sind Para-Athleten besonders anfällig für unbeabsichtigte und absichtliche Verletzungen. Trotz der zunehmenden weltweiten Beteiligung am Parasport gibt es einen Mangel an Erkenntnissen über die Verletzungsepidemiologie. Diese Literaturlücke erschwert die Beurteilung von Risikofaktoren, die Entwicklung von Präventionsstrategien und das Verständnis der Auswirkungen von Behinderungen auf das Verletzungsmuster.

Methoden: Die veröffentlichte Literatur zur Verletzungsepidemiologie bei Para-Athleten wurde überprüft. Unbeabsichtigte Verletzungen wurden als ungeplant definiert und resultieren aus Unfällen oder Überlastung; absichtliche Verletzungen wurden als schädliche Misshandlung (z. B. Mobbing, Belästigung, Missbrauch und alle anderen Formen von absichtlicher Gewalt) definiert.

Ergebnisse: Die Literatur über unbeabsichtigte Verletzungen bei Para-Athleten ist spärlich, deutet aber im Vergleich zu nicht-behinderten Athleten auf eine höhere Rate an unbeabsichtigten Verletzungen hin. Die Verletzungshäufigkeit ist im Winter insgesamt höher als im Sommer beim Parasport. Gehfähige Para-Athleten sind anfälliger für Verletzungen der unteren Extremitäten im Vergleich zu sitzenden Para-Athleten, aber die obere Extremität ist die am häufigsten verletzte Region bei Para-Athleten. Die Literatur über vorsätzliche Verletzungen ist ähnlich dürftig, aber die Daten deuten darauf hin, dass Para-Athleten bis zu viermal häufiger vorsätzliche Gewalt im Sport erleben.

Diskussion: Para-Athleten sind im Vergleich zu nicht-behinderten Athleten deutlich häufiger Opfer vorsätzlicher Gewalt. Die Schlussfolgerungen sind durch die geringe Anzahl von Studien in dieser Population begrenzt. Die Prävalenz- und Inzidenzforschung auf Bevölkerungsebene ist notwendig, um Risikofaktoren und Strategien zur Verletzungsprävention besser zu verstehen.

SCHLÜSSELWÖRTER: Sportverletzungsepidemiologie, Para-Athleten, Vorsätzliche Gewalt, Verletzungsprävention

Introduction

Across the lifespan, individuals with disabilities often experience lower rates of physical activity and organized sport participation when compared to non-disabled individuals (7). External barriers to sport participation include absent or inappropriate environmental adaptations for athletes with disabilities (‘Para athletes’), while other limitations are much more complex, including ableist attitudes towards the differently-abled (43).

Despite this, sport for individuals with physical and/or cognitive disabilities (‘Para sport’), can provide a myriad of social and health-related physiological benefits that have been well documented (7, 17). These benefits are balanced by the risk of injury (1, 7, 16, 17, 20, 31, 32, 39, 43). The current study discusses unintentional injury resulting from physical activity and competition, as well as intentional injury (eg, “intentional violence”) resulting from abuse, as observed in Para sport. A better understanding of injury epidemiology in this population can help enhance the health and well-being of Para athletes, and promote safe, fair, and inclusive sport overall.

The Contemporary Para Sport Movement and its Role in the Epidemiology of Unintentional and Intentional Injury in Para Athletes
International sport organizations are increasingly integrating Para sport into core programming (20). In the United States for instance, the first national training center for rowers with disabilities (‘Para rowers’) was recently opened at the Harry Parker Boathouse in Boston USA, through a partnership with USRowing and Community Rowing Inc. Para rowing is one of 28 sports officially recognized by the International Paralympic Committee (IPC). Twenty-two of these sports are included in current summer and six in winter Paralympic Games, the highest level of competitive Para sport (Table 1). Any athlete wishing to participate must demonstrate an eligible impairment in at least one named impairment category (Table 2). At all levels of competition, global Para sport participation has increased significantly in recent years (16). However, increased participation carries increased risk of sports-related injury. The current study seeks to summarize published literature on the risks of both unintentional and intentional injury in Para athletes, and identify areas for additional research.

Methods

PubMed-indexed literature evaluating the epidemiology of unintentional and intentional injuries in Para athletes was reviewed by five separate reviewers between May and June 2019. Literature was evaluated for relevance to current Para Sport issues, rigor of statistical analysis, and reference to either unintentional or intentional injury to Para athletes. Unintentional injuries are defined as unplanned injuries that result from accidents or overuse during physical training and/or competition, while intentional injuries are distinctly a result of abuse within sport, eg, verbal, physical, sexual and/or emotional abuse by coaches, teammates, or other figures with perceived or real power over the athlete (31).

Results

Unintentional Injuries in Para Athletes
Para athletes experience a different risk profile of unintentional injury in sport when compared to their non-disabled peers, and these injuries can impact athletes’ ability to complete not only sport-related tasks, but also basic activities of daily living (ADLs) (1, 39). An estimated 30% of sport-related injuries that Para athletes endure are acute, such as bone fracture, traumatic brain injury, ligament rupture, and/or tendon tear (32). The remaining 70% are minor in nature, largely due to chronic overuse, such as tendon degeneration, muscle contusion, skin abrasion, sunburn and/or decubitus ulcer (32). There does not seem to be any difference in injury prevalence based on gender (10).

Para sport participation may require accommodations related to the impairment; eg, modification of sport-related movements and equipment. As a result, unintentional injury may result when these accommodations are done improperly, or when athletes must physically engage in their sport in a way that increases injury risk. For example, Para rowers often rely on the asymmetric use of their extremities or require adaptive equipment to row such as chest straps – this may increase the risk of musculoskeletal injury (26) such as exercise-induced diaphragm fatigue (30) and overuse rib stress injury (26).

In addition, type of disability influences injury risk. Ambulant athletes are more susceptible to lower extremity injuries, while seated athletes who may use daily wheelchairs are more susceptible to upper extremity injuries (4, 11, 27, 32). The shoulder for instance, is a complex joint that connects the upper limb to the trunk and functions to provide both mobility and stability to the upper extremity (11). Manual wheelchair users utilize the shoulder as a weight-bearing joint. Unlike the hip however, the shoulder is not a traditionally purposed weight-bearing joint, thus wheelchair tasks such as propulsion, start-stop maneuvers, lifts, and transfers can create undue joint strain. The risk of suffering an upper extremity injury is increased in older Para athletes, those who have a spinal cord injury, and those with muscle imbalance about the shoulder girdle (11).

Further, Para athletes such as Para rowers rely on the shoulder for activities related to both sport and daily living, yet upper extremity injuries have not yet been described in Para rowers who regularly use manual wheelchairs, and there is a lack of knowledge of musculoskeletal injury patterns in Para rowers.

Cognitive impairment also influences patterns of unintentional injury in sport as well. Those with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), epilepsy, autism, and perceptual and communication impairments, such as hearing and visual, are at higher risk of unintentional musculoskeletal injury compared to the general population (41). This may be due to relatively reduced levels of physical fitness, as measured by endurance, balance, and flexibility, which can negatively impact the efficiency of movement patterns and increase risk of pain, strain, and injury (35).

Season and weather conditions can affect the likelihood of sustaining a sport-related injury as well. Generally, injuries tend to be more common during winter Para sports as compared to summer contests (6). At the Winter Sochi Paralympic Games for example, average injury incidence rate (IR) across all sports was 26.5 per 1000 athlete days (95% CI 22.7% to 30.8%) with injuries among Para alpine skiing and Para snowboard athletes being the highest at an IR of 41.1 per 1000 athletes days (95% CI 33.7 to 49.6) (6). In contrast, Para athletes at the summer Paralympic Games in London and Beijing experienced a significantly lower number of injuries with an average incidence rate of only 12 per 1000 athlete-days in Beijing (95% CI 7.1 to 17) and 4.4 per 1000 athlete-days in London across all sports (95% CI 1.1 to 7.6) (10). In London, the greatest injury rates were in Football 5-a-side (IR 22.4 injuries per 1000 athlete-days; 95% CI 14.1 to 33.8), and Goalball (IR 19.5 injuries per 1000 athlete-days; 95% CI 13.2 to 27.7) (37, 42).

Intentional Injuries in Para Athletes
In order for athletes to succeed, it is imperative to foster an environment that upholds the values of ‘Safe Sport’, defined by the International Olympic Committee as an athletic environment that is respectful, equitable, and free from all forms of intentional violence (21). ‘Intentional injury’ or ‘intentional violence’ refer to volitional acts that result, or have the potential to result in, physical and/or psychological harm and are thus in direct violation of the Safe Sport mission (13).

Of note, athletes with a physical and/or intellectual impairment may be up to four times more likely to be victims of intentional violence when compared to athletes without impairment (21). One study found that of 305 adult recreational and elite Para athletes surveyed about their experiences in sport as children (up until age 18), nearly one-half reported experiencing psychological abuse, nearly one-third reported physical violence, and one-third reported sexual abuse (36). This study also found that Para athletes had increased odds of experiencing abuse compared to non-disabled athletes: 2.90 increased odds of experiencing sexual abuse (99% CI 1.84 to 4.59; p<0.001) and 3.23 increased odds of experiencing physical abuse (99% CI 2.02 to 5.15; p<0.001) (36). Various forms of physical abuse have been reported in the literature, including being shoved, punched, or having something thrown at the body; however, the most common type of physically harmful behavior reported is excessive training or continuing to train when physically injured or exhausted (19, 28).

The Role of Power Imbalance in Intentional Injury in Para Athletes
Power imbalance is at the core of intentional violence in Para and all other athletes. Importantly, the increased risk of abuse among individuals with disabilities is not limited to sport settings, but has been documented within general educational, community, and healthcare institutions (3, 5, 12, 14, 18, 23, 29, 40, 44). A number of factors place athletes (and non-athletes) with impairment at increased risk of abuse, including increased dependence on others, vulnerable living arrangements, and communication limitations (14, 22, 34). Athletes with impairment may be vulnerable to inappropriate contact during routine health interventions such as medication administration due to an impairment that may physically prevent the athlete from contesting. Furthermore, athletes with higher care needs may be at increased risk of intentional violence and more easily exploited by sport actors such as teammates, coaches, and caregivers who assist the athlete with ADLs including transfers, hygiene, dressing and feeding (2, 9, 15, 21). This can take place through bullying by teammates or coaches, being overextended by coaches, or neglect by caregivers. Lastly, athletes with intellectual impairment may experience aggression due to difficulties with communication, fewer meaningful relationships, and increased assistance required to navigate social and sport settings (24, 25, 45).

Ongoing Gaps in Knowledge
Available data suggest that unintentional and intentional injuries are highly prevalent among athletes with disabilities, but to date, there have been few rigorous studies on these topics. For example, there is a paucity of data regarding unintentional injury for Para rowers and other Para athletes who rely heavily on their (vulnerable) upper extremities. Only two published peer-reviewed citations have been recorded, each of which describes a single, individual Para rower and neither of which address upper extremity injury (26, 30). Further, only one 2018 review summarized current knowledge about intentional violence in athletes with impairment and it included a total of eight citations. The majority of available literature described bullying in young, visually impaired athletes (33). This represents a dearth of information and illustrates that much is still unknown about the true breadth and depth of injury epidemiology in Para athletes, the risk factors for experiencing injury, and the effectiveness of athlete protection programming.

Evidence-Based Injury Prevention Strategies
While few studies involving injury prevention interventions exist in Para sport (8), limited data suggest that preventative training programs may reduce unintentional injury rates in elite (i.e. Paralympic) Para athletes. After mandatory periodic health examinations were introduced before the London Paralympic Games, decreased rates of injury were observed in Polish Para athletes, when compared to observed injury rates at the previous games in Beijing where only 6.6% of Polish athletes completed periodic health examinations (10). Evidence-based policy changes may also contribute to the prevention of unintentional injury in Para athletes, as seen in the 2010 Vancouver Winter Paralympic Games when the number of lower limb fractures for Para ice hockey decreased significantly after a regulation change on protective equipment and sled height (38). Additional important intentional injury prevention strategies include engaging athletes with resources and organizations that fight for their rights and educate athletes on how to recognize abuse. Believing survivors and validating their suffering is also a critical step towards addressing and preventing intentional injury in Para sport (21).

Conclusion

Despite a myriad benefits, sport can place athletes with disabilities at risk of injury, and current research suggests that Para athletes face different types of unintentional, sport-related injuries than non-disabled athletes. Para athletes face significantly increased risk of intentional injury in sport, however, further research is needed to better understand risk factors and the effectiveness of injury prevention programs, in order to most effectively serve and empower Para athletes worldwide.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Professor Jürgen M. Steinacker and the World Rowing Sports Medicine Commission for championing inclusion by embracing scholarship related to Para sport and Para rowing, with enthusiasm.

In addition, the authors thank Yale School of Medicine professional librarian Mark Gentry for assistance with data management during the initial literature review.

Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. AHMED OH, HUSSAIN AW, BEASLEY I, DVORAK J, WEILER R. Enhancingperformance and sport injury prevention in disability sport:moving forwards in the field of football. Br J Sports Med. 2015; 49:566-567.
  2. BRACKENRIDGE CHE. OWNED ME BASICALLY...‘ Women’sExperience of Sexual Abuse in Sport. Int Rev Sociol Sport. 1997;32: 115-130.
  3. BRODIE N, MCCOLGAN MD, SPECTOR ND, TURCHI RM. Child Abuse inChildren and Youth with Special Health Care Needs. Pediatr Rev.2017; 38: 463-470.
  4. COOPER RA, TUAKLI-WOSORNU YA, HENDERSON GV, QUINBY E,DICIANNO BE, TSANG K, DING D, COOPER R, CRYTZER TM, KOONTZ AM,RICE I, BLEAKNEY AW. Engineering and Technology in WheelchairSport. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2018; 29: 347-369.
  5. DAMMEYER J, CHAPMAN M. A national survey on violence anddiscrimination among people with disabilities. BMC PublicHealth. 2018; 18: 355.
  6. DERMAN W, SCHWELLNUS MP, JORDAAN E, RUNCIMAN P, VAN DE VLIET P,BLAUWET C, WEBBORN N, WILLICK S, STOMPHORST J. High incidence ofinjury at the Sochi 2014 Winter Paralympic Games: a prospectivecohort study of 6564 athlete days. Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50: 1069-1074.
  7. EVANS MB, SHIRAZIPOUR CH, ALLAN V, ZANHOUR M, SWEET SN, MARTINGINIS KA, LATIMER-CHEUNG AE. Integrating insights from theparasport community to understand optimal Experiences:The Quality Parasport Participation Framework. Psychol SportExerc. 2018; 37: 79-90.
  8. FAGHER K, LEXELL J. Sports-related injuries in athletes withdisabilities. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014; 24: e320-e331.
  9. FASTING K. Sexual Harassment and Abuse in Sport. In: SobiechG, Gunter S, eds. Sport & Gender - (inter) national sportssociological gender studies: Theoretical approaches, practicesand perspectives. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS; 2017: 167-77.
  10. GAWRÓNSKI W, SOBIECKA J, MALESZA J. Fit and healthyParalympians—medical care guidelines for disabled athletes:a study of the injuries and illnesses incurred by the PolishParalympic team in Beijing 2008 and London 2012. Br J SportsMed. 2013; 47: 844-849.
  11. HEYWARD OW, VEGTER RJK, DE GROOT S, VAN DER WOUDE LHV. Shouldercomplaints in wheelchair athletes: A systematic review. PLoSOne. 2017; 12: e0188410.
  12. HIBBARD RA, DESCH LW. Maltreatment of Children WithDisabilities. Pediatrics. 2007; 119: 1018-1025.
  13. KERR GA, STIRLING AE. Child Protection in Sport: Implications ofan Athlete-Centered Philosophy. Quest. 2008; 60: 307-323.
  14. KIRBY SL, DEMERS G, PARENT S. Vulnerability/prevention:Considering the needs of disabled and gay athletes in the contextof sexual harassment and abuse. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2008;6: 407-426.
  15. KIRBY SL, GREAVES L, HANKIVSKY O. The dome of silence: Sexualharassment and abuse in sport: Fernwood Halifax; 2000.
  16. LEGG D. Paralympic Games: History and Legacy of a GlobalMovement. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2018; 29: 417-425.
  17. LI R, SIT CHP, YU JJ, DUAN JZJ, FAN TCM, MCKENZIE TL, WONG SHS. Correlates of physical activity in children and adolescents withphysical disabilities: A systematic review. Prev Med. 2016; 89:184-193.
  18. MASALA C, PETRETTO DR. From disablement to enablement:conceptual models of disability in the 20th century. DisabilRehabil. 2008; 30: 1233-1244.
  19. MCPHERSON L, LONG M, NICHOLSON M, CAMERON N, ATKINS P, MORRIS M. Secrecy Surrounding the Physical Abuse of Child Athletes inAustralia 2016. Australian Social Work. 2016; 70: 42-53.
  20. MISENER L, WASSER K. International sport development-Chapter 3 in: Managing Sport Development: An internationalapproach. 1st Edition ed. London: Taylor & Francis Group; 2016.
  21. MOUNTJOY M, BRACKENRIDGE C, ARRINGTON M, BLAUWET C, CARSKASHEPPARDA, FASTING K, KIRBY S, LEAHY T, MARKS S, MARTIN K, STARR K,TIIVAS A, BUDGETT R. International Olympic Committee consensusstatement: harassment and abuse (non-accidental violence)in sport. Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50: 1019-1029.
  22. NATIONAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN(NSPCC). Safeguarding and inclusion of deaf and disabledchildren and young people in sport, 2014. [19th May 2019].
  23. NOWAK CB. Recognition and prevention of child abuse in the childwith disability. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2015; 169:293-301.
  24. ROSE CA, ESPELAGE DL, ARAGON SR, ELLIOTT J. Bullying andvictimization among students in special education and generaleducation curricula. Exceptionality Education International.2011; 21: 2-14.
  25. ROSE CA, SIMPSON CG, PREAST JL. Exploring psychosocial predictorsof bullying involvement for students with disabilities. RemedialSpec Educ. 2016; 37: 308-317.
  26. SMOLJANOVIC T, BOJANIC I, POLLOCK CL, RADONIC R. Rib stressfracture in a male adaptive rower from the arms and shoulderssport class: case report. Croat Med J. 2011; 52: 644-647.
  27. SOO HOO J. Shoulder Pain and the Weight-bearing Shoulder in theWheelchair Athlete. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2019; 27: 42-47.
  28. STAFFORD A, ALEXANDER K, FRY D. Playing through Pain: Childrenand Young People’s Experiences of Physical Aggression andViolence in Sport. Child Abuse Rev. 2013; 22: 287-299.
  29. SULLIVAN PM. Violence exposure among children with disabilities.Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2009; 12: 196-216.
  30. TILLER NB, AGGAR TR, WEST CR, ROMER LM. Exercise-induceddiaphragm fatigue in a Paralympic champion rower with spinalcord injury. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md : 1985)2018; 124: 805-11.
  31. TOMLINSON A, YORGANCI I. Male coach/female athlete relations:Gender and power relations in competitive sport1997.
  32. TUAKLI-WOSORNU YA, MASHKOVSKIY E, OTTESEN T, GENTRY M, JENSEN D,WEBBORN N. Acute and Chronic Musculoskeletal Injury in ParaSport: A Critical Review. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2018; 29:205-243.
  33. TUAKLI-WOSORNU YA, SUN Q, GENTRY M, ONA AYALA KE, DOOLAN FC,OTTESEN TD, CALDWELL B, NAUSHAD N, HUANG P, KIRBY S. Nonaccidentalharms (‘abuse’) in athletes with impairment (‘paraathletes’): a state-of-the-art review. Br J Sports Med. 2019:bjsports-2018-099854. [Epub ahead of print].
  34. VALENTI-HEIN D, SCHWARTZ L. The sexual abuse interview for thosewith developmental disabilities. Santa Barbara: James StanfieldCompany 1995.
  35. VAN DE VLIET P, RINTALA P, FROJD K, VERELLEN J, VAN HOUTTE S, DALY DJ,VANLANDEWIJCK YC. Physical fitness profile of elite athletes withintellectual disability. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006; 16: 417-425.
  36. VERTOMMEN T, SCHIPPER-VAN VELDHOVEN N, WOUTERS K, KAMPEN JK,BRACKENRIDGE CH, RHIND DJ, NEELS K, VAN DEN EEDE F. Interpersonalviolence against children in sport in the Netherlands andBelgium 2015. Child Abuse Negl. 2016; 51: 223-236.
  37. WEBBORN N, EMERY C. Descriptive epidemiology of Paralympicsports injuries. PM R. 2014; 6: S18-S22.
  38. WEBBORN N, WILLICK S, EMERY CA. The injury experience at the 2010winter paralympic games. Clinical journal of sport medicine :official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine 2012;22: 3-9.
  39. WEILER R, VAN MECHELEN W, FULLER C, VERHAGEN E. Sport InjuriesSustained by Athletes with Disability: A Systematic Review.Sports Med. 2016; 46: 1141-1153.
  40. WESTCOTT HL, JONES DP. The abuse of disabled children. J ChildPsychol Psychiatry. 1999; 40: 497-506.
  41. WHITE D, MCPHERSON L, LENNOX N, WARE RS. Injury amongadolescents with intellectual disability: A prospective cohortstudy. Injury. 2018; 49: 1091-1096.
  42. WILLICK SE, WEBBORN N, EMERY C, BLAUWET CA, PIT-GROSHEIDE P,STOMPHORST J, VAN DE VLIET P, PATINO MARQUES NA, MARTINEZFERRERJO, JORDAAN E, DERMAN W, SCHWELLNUS M. The epidemiologyof injuries at the London 2012 Paralympic Games. Br J SportsMed. 2013; 47: 426-432.
  43. WILSON NC, KHOO S. Benefits and barriers to sports participationfor athletes with disabilities: the case of Malaysia. Disabil Soc.2013; 28: 1132-1145.
  44. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. World report on disability 2011.2011.
  45. YELL ML, KATSIYANNIS A, ROSE CA, HOUCHINS DE. Bullying andharassment of students with disabilities in schools: Legalconsiderations and policy formation. Remedial Spec Educ. 2016;37: 274-284.
Yetsa A. Tuakli-Wosornu, MD, MPH
Assistant Clinical Professor
Yale School of Public Health, Department
of Chronic Disease Epidemiology,
60 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
yetsa.tuakli-wosornu@yale.edu